Status balance58% not started or in programme
Not started or in programme was the largest of the three published status shares. Started or completed together accounted for 42%, leaving a calculated 58% residual not started or in programme.
Permanent local-authority profile
Hillingdon cladding remediation progress
Government programme-monitoring data for residential buildings 11 metres and over identified with unsafe cladding, with local movement and comparison context.
Local position
What the published figures show
42% of monitored buildings in Hillingdon were recorded as having started or completed remediation. The completed share was 16% and the underway share was 26%.
The count of monitored buildings is deliberately published as 11–50, not an exact number. This profile preserves that disclosure-control band.
- Completed remediation
- 16%
- Remediation underway
- 26%
- Not started or in programme
- 58%
Calculated local reading
What distinguishes the Hillingdon profile
These observations are derived from the published band and rounded percentages. They add local context without identifying buildings, explaining causes or assigning a performance score.
Completion comparison−22 points
The completed share for Hillingdon was 22 percentage points below the rounded England monitored-portfolio share of 38% and 22 points below the published London share of 38%.
Displayed-profile context60 of 67
The completed percentage falls in the lowest quarter of displayed authority profiles. This is a percentage comparison only—not a council-performance, building-safety or remediation-speed ranking.
Portfolio disclosure11–50
Hillingdon is within the 11–50 monitored-building band. Because the source protects the exact local count, these percentages cannot be converted into a reliable number of buildings.
Monthly movement
How the Hillingdon profile has changed
From May 2026 to June 2026, the completed share was unchanged, while the underway share rose by 3 points.
Movement is not necessarily a direct measure of work completed during the month. Buildings can enter, leave or transfer between programmes and records may be revised.
| Reporting month | Monitored band | Completed | Underway | Not started / in programme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2026 | 11–50 | 16% | 26% | 58% |
| May 2026 | 11–50 | 16% | 23% | 61% |
| April 2026 | 11–50 | 13% | 23% | 65% |
Comparison context
Local, regional and national completion percentages
These are raw programme-monitoring percentages. They do not adjust for building height, tenure, programme mix, complexity or when buildings entered the portfolio.
Detailed local comparison
Hillingdon alongside comparable London profiles
The nearest published completion percentages provide a practical comparison set. They do not control for portfolio size, building complexity, tenure, programme route or entry date.
Reusable evidence
Download the chart and profile data
The SVG retains its reporting period and MHCLG attribution so it can be placed into council papers, articles and research reports without separating the chart from its context.
Citation and reuse
Use the permanent profile URL
Keep the authority, reporting period and underlying government source together. Archived national files are available from the main tracker for reproducible analysis.
Fire Safety Services (2026), “Hillingdon cladding remediation progress profile”, derived from MHCLG Building Safety Remediation data for 30 June 2026, https://firesafetyservices.org.uk/cladding-remediation-tracker/hillingdon/, accessed [date].
Building-level action
What this means if you manage a building
Published area progress cannot establish the position of a particular block. Building owners and responsible persons should keep the fire risk assessment, external-wall evidence, evacuation arrangements and remediation records aligned with the building’s current condition.
Important limitations
What this profile cannot establish
- It does not list or identify individual buildings.
- It does not establish whether a particular block is safe, funded, complete or signed off.
- Authorities with smaller monitored portfolios are not represented in this local profile dataset.
- Rounded percentages and banded totals cannot be converted reliably into exact local building counts.
- Buildings can enter, leave or transfer between programmes, and source records can be revised.
Frequently asked questions
Hillingdon cladding remediation FAQs
How many buildings are monitored for cladding remediation in Hillingdon?
MHCLG publishes Hillingdon in the 11–50 monitored-building band. The precise local count is withheld for disclosure control, so the percentages should not be converted into an exact number of buildings.
What percentage of cladding remediation is complete in Hillingdon?
16% of the monitored Hillingdon portfolio was recorded as complete at 30 June 2026. A further 26% was underway and the calculated residual was 58% not started or in programme.
Has the Hillingdon completed percentage changed?
Between May 2026 and June 2026, the published completed share was unchanged. Changes can reflect record revisions, programme transfers and portfolio changes as well as physical progress.
Does this tracker show whether a particular building in Hillingdon is safe?
No. The source is aggregated programme-monitoring data and does not identify individual buildings, confirm their safety, or replace building-specific fire-risk and external-wall evidence.
When was the Hillingdon cladding profile updated?
The current figures relate to 30 June 2026, were published by government on 29 July 2026, and this derived profile was updated on 25 August 2026.
Primary source
June 2026 MHCLG release
This independent profile derives from government management information and the accompanying remediation dashboard. Read the technical note for collection, quality, disclosure-control and revision details.
Official accessible release · Technical note · Reuse guidance