Who is behind the information

Editorial team and technical review

Fire Safety Services publishes source-led guidance for people responsible for premises. This page identifies who maintains that information, what the review covers and what our byline does—and does not—mean.

Published by: Fire Safety ServicesEditorial identity: Fire Safety Services editorial teamLast materially reviewed: 1 August 2026

The accountable team

Who prepares and reviews the guidance

The Fire Safety Services editorial team researches, writes, checks and maintains the website’s guidance, tools and data explanations. A qualified fire risk assessor contributes assessment-focused input where the subject calls for practical FRA knowledge.

The service does not use invented individual bylines or publish qualifications that have not been authorised for public use. Until an individual reviewer chooses to publish their name and credentials, pages identify the accountable editorial team rather than presenting an anonymous or fictional expert.

Important distinction

Editorial review improves the reliability and traceability of general information. It is not a site inspection, legal opinion, regulator approval or fire risk assessment for a particular building.

Review framework

What is checked before and after publication

The depth of review reflects the safety, legal and technical significance of the subject.

01

Search intent and scope

The page answers the stated question directly, identifies the jurisdiction and explains when building-specific judgement is still required.

02

Primary evidence

Legal claims are checked against legislation.gov.uk, GOV.UK, regulators, fire and rescue services and the official publisher of relevant guidance or standards.

03

Legal and technical language

Requirements, official guidance and voluntary good practice are separated. Absolute claims are avoided where duties depend on the building or circumstances.

04

Practical FRA context

Assessment-focused content is checked for realistic scope, competence limits and the difference between general guidance and professional site-specific findings.

05

Structured evidence

Dates, datasets, citations, downloads and structured data are checked so search engines and readers can identify the publisher, source and material-review date.

06

Corrections and change

Material legal, factual or safety corrections trigger a page update and a new review date. Minor presentation changes do not automatically reset that date.

Evidence hierarchy

Sources we prioritise

  1. Legislation and official statutory materialThe current enacted text, commencement material and official explanatory publications.
  2. Government, regulator and enforcing-authority guidanceGOV.UK, the Building Safety Regulator, fire and rescue services and other accountable public bodies.
  3. Standards publishers and recognised professional bodiesUsed for methodology and professional context, while clearly distinguishing standards from legislation.
  4. Reliable secondary evidenceUsed only where it adds context and does not replace a more authoritative available source.

Transparency and corrections

Check the standards or report an issue

Read the full publishing policy, including how commercial referrals are separated from editorial conclusions and how substantive corrections are handled.

Read the editorial standardsContact the editorial team